以下12點內容是老師和我從收集的審稿人意見中總結出來的，希望能對大家的寫作有所幫助，也希望大家能給與支持。其中的錯誤，請各位大牛不吝賜教。以下12點是隨機排序，無輕重主次之分。每一點內容由總結性標題和代表性審稿人意見構成。
1、目標和結果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript. needs careful editing by
someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention
to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and
results of the study are clear to the reader.
2、未解釋研究方法或解釋不充分。
◆ In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and
statistical methods used in the study.
◆ Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these
various experiments should be provided.
3、對于研究設計的rationale:
Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the
study design.
4、夸張地陳述結論/夸大成果/不嚴謹：
The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not
show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer
formulation.
5、對hypothesis的清晰界定：
A hypothesis needs to be presented
6、對某個概念或工具使用的rationale/定義概念：
What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume
ratio?
7、對研究問題的定義：
Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear,
write one section to define the problem
8、如何凸現原創性以及如何充分地寫literature review:
The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so
novel.
9、對claim,如A>B的證明，verification:
There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with
previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an
improvement on previous work.
10、嚴謹度問題：
MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove
that.
11、格式(重視程度)：
◆ In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It
is close but not completely correct. I have attached a pdf file with
"Instructions for Authors" which shows examples.
◆ Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is
properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, please consult the
formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the "Instructions and
Forms" button in he upper right-hand corner of the screen.
12、語言問題(出現最多的問題)：
有關語言的審稿人意見：
◆ It is noted that your manuscript. needs careful editing by
someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention
to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and
results of the study are clear to the reader.
◆ The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper
translation/reviewing service before submission; only then can a proper review
be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are
not complete sentences.
◆ As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal.
There are problems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause
construction.
◆ The English of your manuscript. must be improved before
resubmission. We strongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague
who is well-versed in English or whose native language is English.
◆ Please have someone competent in the English language and
the subject matter of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ?
◆ the quality of English needs improving.
Encouragement from reviewers:
◆ I would be very glad to re-review the paper in greater depth
once it has been edited because the subject is interesting.
◆ There is continued interest in your manuscript. titled "……"
which you submitted to the Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: Part B -
Applied Biomaterials.
◆ The Submission has been greatly improved and is worthy of
publication.
引用
刪除
hongjingzi / 2009-11-17 11:24:48
