• <li id="ccaac"></li>
  • <table id="ccaac"><rt id="ccaac"></rt></table>
  • <td id="ccaac"></td>
  • <td id="ccaac"></td>
  • ASTM C1576-05(2017)
    通過室溫恒壓力彎曲試驗(應力破裂)測定高級陶瓷慢裂紋生長參數的標準試驗方法

    Standard Test Method for Determination of Slow Crack Growth Parameters of Advanced Ceramics by Constant Stress Flexural Testing (Stress Rupture) at Ambient Temperature


    標準號
    ASTM C1576-05(2017)
    發布
    2005年
    發布單位
    美國材料與試驗協會
    當前最新
    ASTM C1576-05(2017)
     
     
    引用標準
    ASTM C1145 ASTM C1161 ASTM C1322 ASTM C1368 ASTM C1465 ASTM E112 ASTM E1823 ASTM E337 ASTM E399 ASTM E4 ASTM E6
    適用范圍

    4.1 The service life of many structural ceramic components is often limited by the subcritical growth of cracks. This test method provides an approach for appraising the relative slow crack growth susceptibility of ceramic materials under specified environments at ambient temperature. Furthermore, this test method may establish the influences of processing variables and composition on slow crack growth as well as on strength behavior of newly developed or existing materials, thus allowing tailoring and optimizing material processing for further modification. In summary, this test method may be used for material development, quality control, characterization, design code or model verification, and limited design data generation purposes.

    Note 4: Data generated by this test method do not necessarily correspond to crack velocities that may be encountered in service conditions. The use of data generated by this test method for design purposes, depending on the range and magnitude of applied stresses used, may entail extrapolation and uncertainty.

    4.2 This test method is related to Test Method C1368 (“constant stress-rate flexural testing”), however, C1368 uses constant stress rates to determine corresponding flexural strengths whereas this test method employs constant stress to determine corresponding times to failure. In general, the data generated by this test method may be more representative of actual service conditions as compared with those by constant stress-rate testing. However, in terms of test time, constant stress testing is inherently and significantly more time consuming than constant stress rate testing.

    4.3 The flexural stress computation in this test method is based on simple elastic beam theory, with the assumptions that the material is isotropic and homogeneous, the moduli of elasticity in tension and compression are identical, and the material is linearly elastic. The grain size should be no greater than one-fiftieth (1/50 ) of the beam depth as measured by the mean linear intercept method (Test Methods E112). In cases where the material grain size is bimodal or the grain size distribution is wide, the limit should apply to the larger grains.

    4.4 The test specimen sizes and test fixtures have been selected in accordance with Test Methods C1161 and C1368, which provides a balance between practical configurations and resulting errors, as discussed in Ref (4, 5).

    4.5 The data are evaluated by regression of log applied stress versus log time to failure to the experimental data. The recommendation is to determine the slow crack growth parameters by applying the power law crack velocity function. For derivation of this, and for alternative crack velocity functions, see Appendix X1.

    Note 5: 


    ASTM C1576-05(2017)相似標準


    推薦





    Copyright ?2007-2022 ANTPEDIA, All Rights Reserved
    京ICP備07018254號 京公網安備1101085018 電信與信息服務業務經營許可證:京ICP證110310號

  • <li id="ccaac"></li>
  • <table id="ccaac"><rt id="ccaac"></rt></table>
  • <td id="ccaac"></td>
  • <td id="ccaac"></td>
  • 床戏视频