ASTM C1239-13
高級陶瓷用報告單軸強度數據和評估維泊爾分布參數的標準實施規程
Standard Practice for Reporting Uniaxial Strength Data and Estimating Weibull Distribution Parameters for Advanced Ceramics
ASTM C1239-13 發布歷史
ASTM C1239-13由美國材料與試驗協會 US-ASTM 發布于 2013。
ASTM C1239-13 在中國標準分類中歸屬于: Q32 特種陶瓷。
ASTM C1239-13 高級陶瓷用報告單軸強度數據和評估維泊爾分布參數的標準實施規程的最新版本是哪一版？
最新版本是 ASTM C1239-13(2018) 。
ASTM C1239-13 發布之時，引用了標準
- ASTM C1145 高級陶瓷標準術語
- ASTM C1322 高級陶瓷斷裂原因分形與表征的標準實踐
- ASTM E178 進行遠距離觀測的標準操作規程
- ASTM E456 統計學名詞及相關術語
- ASTM E6 機械試驗方法的有關標準術語
- IEEE/ASTM SI 10 美國國家公制標準
ASTM C1239-13的歷代版本如下：
- 2018年 ASTM C1239-13(2018) 報告先進陶瓷單軸強度數據和威布爾分布參數的標準實施規程
- 2013年 ASTM C1239-13 高級陶瓷用報告單軸強度數據和評估維泊爾分布參數的標準實施規程
- 2007年 ASTM C1239-07 高級陶瓷用報告單軸強度數據和評估維泊爾分布參數的標準實施規程
- 2006年 ASTM C1239-06a 報告單軸強度數據和評估高級陶瓷維泊爾分布參數的標準實施規程
- 2006年 ASTM C1239-06 報告先進陶瓷單軸強度數據和威布爾分布參數的標準實施規程
- 2000年 ASTM C1239-00(2005) 高級陶瓷的單軸強度數據報告和維泊爾分布參數估計的標準規程
- 2000年 ASTM C1239-00 報告單軸強度數據和評估高級陶瓷維泊爾分布參數的標準操作規程
5.1 Advanced ceramics usually display a linear stress-strain behavior to failure. Lack of ductility combined with flaws that have various sizes and orientations leads to scatter in failure strength. Strength is not a deterministic property but instead reflects an intrinsic fracture toughness and a distribution (size and orientation) of flaws present in the material. This practice is applicable to brittle monolithic ceramics that fail as a result of catastrophic propagation of flaws present in the material. This practice is also applicable to composite ceramics that do not exhibit any appreciable bilinear or nonlinear deformation behavior. In addition, the composite must contain a sufficient quantity of uniformly distributed reinforcements such that the material is effectively homogeneous. Whisker-toughened ceramic composites may be representative of this type of material.
5.2 Two- and three-parameter formulations exist for the Weibull distribution. This practice is restricted to the two-parameter formulation. An objective of this practice is to obtain point estimates of the unknown parameters by using well-defined functions that incorporate the failure data. These functions are referred to as estimators. It is desirable that an estimator be consistent and efficient. In addition, the estimator should produce unique, unbiased estimates of the distribution parameters (6). Different types of estimators exist, including moment estimators, least-squares estimators, and maximum likelihood estimators. This practice details the use of maximum likelihood estimators due to the efficiency and the ease of application when censored failure populations are encountered.
5.3 Tensile and flexural test specimens are the most commonly used test configurations for advanced ceramics. The observed strength values are dependent on test specimen size and geometry. Parameter estimates can be computed for a given test specimen geometry ( m^, σ^θ), but it is suggested that the parameter estimates be transformed and reported as material-specific parameters ( m^, σ^0). In addition, different flaw distributions (for example, failures due to inclusions or machining damage) may be observed, and each will have its own strength distribution parameters. The procedure for transforming parameter estimates for typical test specimen geometries and flaw distributions is outlined in 8.6.
5.4 Many factors affect the estimates of the distribution parameters. The total number of test specimens plays a significant role. Initially, the uncertainty associated with parameter estimates decreases significantly as the number of test specimens increases. However, a point of diminishing returns is reached when the cost of performing additional strength tests may not be justified. This suggests that a practical number of strength tests should be performed to obtain a desired l......
點擊查看大圖
- 標準號
- ASTM C1239-13
- 發布
- 2013年
- 發布單位
- 美國材料與試驗協會
- 替代標準
- ASTM C1239-13(2018)
- 當前最新
- ASTM C1239-13(2018)
- 引用標準
- ASTM C1145 ASTM C1322 ASTM E178 ASTM E456 ASTM E6 IEEE/ASTM SI 10